Thursday, September 22, 2011

A SHRINK'S POINT OF VIEW

The patient is severely delusional.
He has shown a proclivity to vengeance, is easy to anger and overly dramatic, in addition to being prone to fits of rage and mistrust.
He has, on one occasion that we know of, tested a man to unimaginable limits, his way of gaging loyalty.

He has killed, drowned and tortured many. In fact, for all intents and purposes he could be considered a danger to society. An apocalyptic danger, in fact.
In the past, he has incited violence amongst different cultures and has cheer-leaded occupation, apartheid and injustice.
He has used people as pawns in a diabolical game with another patient, L. Together, they have wreaked havoc and misery.

He is greedy. No matter how much money you give him, he still wants more.
He wants more houses. Everywhere.
He wants more loyalty and love, exhibiting a tremendous amount of egoism.
He wants unlimited allegiance and will punish those he thinks have transgressed him.
He is hard to please.
His rules are rigid and never yielding.

He can be forgiving, but only if you confess.
He can be kind, but only if you never anger him, and anything could anger him.
He is mostly silent and speaks to the very few, preferring to communicate with world leaders instead of the Average Joe.

The patient seems to believe he can be in multiple places at the same time. He believes he is the be-all and end-all of knowledge.

He could also be suffering from multiple personality disorder. 
He is under the impression that he got a virgin pregnant without ever touching her and goes so far as to assert she gave birth to him. At any given point, he will insist he is actually three entities. 


The patient really, really dislikes apples.
Bananas, however, are tolerated.

Overall, the diagnosis includes messianic complex, histrionic and personality mood disorder, and multiple personality disorder. In addition, he needs to undergo anger management courses.
We recommend an extensive stay at a psychiatric ward for supervision and medication, to be re-evaluated after a one-year period.
Oh, and one more thing: He only answers to the name "God."


8 comments:

  1. And i thought you were talking about Michel Aoun lol

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good! I was hoping not to give it away too soon, so I guess it worked :D Thank you for reading and commenting!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that the last statement clarifies things....I know many people that go to that same shrink...or veterinary...not sure.

    ReplyDelete
  4. very good article
    loved the shock element in the end.
    Here's my answer:
    The god you describe is horrible.
    But he does not fit the god from the Bible.
    You might disagree if you pick out bits and pieces from the Bible and say: look! This is what he does!
    But that would be doing injustice to the text just as picking out things out of context from any other book would lead to misunderstanding it.
    The god I know is the one who fully revealed himself in Jesus.
    So many people have never seriously carefully read the Gospels. I would encourage you to do that even if you have read it before.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read this post around 6 times now... WAW! I thought I commented before...

    ReplyDelete